621 research outputs found

    Which children and young people are excluded from school? Findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) - poster abstract

    No full text
    Poster abstract presented at Spring Meeting for Clinician Scientists in Training 2015BACKGROUND: School exclusion is a disciplinary method used to remove a child from the school environment. It is known to affect certain groups disproportionately, including boys, some ethnic minorities, children in care, children in poverty, and children with special educational needs. Population-based studies on wider characteristics of excluded pupils are scarce. The aim of this study was to describe factors associated with school exclusion in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), focussing on neurodevelopment and mental health. METHODS: ALSPAC is a prospective population-based British birth cohort study, with the initial sample consisting of 14 541 pregnancies. The study has data for whether a child has been permanently excluded from school up to the age of 8 years as reported by parents and also permanent and fixed period exclusions in the preceding 12 months as reported by parents and young people at age 16 years. Upstream risk factors were assessed for associations with exclusion on univariable analysis. The association with social communication difficulties was investigated with multivariable logistic regression. FINDINGS: Data for exclusions up to the age of 8 years were available for 8245 ALSPAC participants and 4482 participants for exclusion at age 16 years. 53 pupils (0·6%) were excluded from school by age 8 years, and 390 (8·7%) at age 16 years. The odds of exclusion by 8 years and at 16 years were increased with male sex (p=0·001 and p<0·0001, respectively), low family income (p=0·014 and p<0·0001), family adversity (p<0·0001 for both), maternal psychopathology (p=0·013 and p=0·004), low intelligence quotient (p=0·041 and p<0·0001), mental health difficulties (p<0·0001 for both), psychiatric disorder (p<0·0001 for both), social communication difficulties (p<0·0001 for both), antisocial activities (p=0·004 and p<0·0001), bullying or being bullied (p=0·005 and p<0·0001), low educational attainment (p<0·0001 for both), and increased special educational needs (p<0·0001 for both). On multivariable analysis, having social communication difficulties above a clinical threshold on the Social Communication Disorders Checklist was strongly associated with exclusion by 8 years (odds ratio 7·4, 95% CI 3·6-15·4) and at 16 years (2·3, 1·5-3·5), after adjustment for relevant confounders. INTERPRETATION: Although cohort attrition and small numbers of exclusions at 8 years are limitations, this study suggests that school exclusion is associated with numerous risk factors identifiable at or before primary school entry. Child health professionals have an important role in the holistic assessment of children who are excluded, or who are at risk of school exclusion. There is particular need to ensure that mental health and neurodevelopmental difficulties are appropriately recognised and supported. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Academic Clinical Fellowship

    Development of the Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT)

    Get PDF
    Background: A Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT) was developed and tested in a multicentre observational pilot study. The tool enables monitoring and benchmarking perioperative safety performance across departments and hospitals, covering international patient safety goals. Methods: Nineteen perioperative patient safety observation topics were selected from Dutch perioperative patient safety guidelines, which also cover international patient safety goals. All items that measured these selected topics were then extracted from available local observation checklists of the participating hospitals. Experts individually prioritized the best measurement items per topic in an initial written Delphi round. The second (face to face) Delphi round resulted in consensus on the content of SPOT, after which the measurable elements (MEs) per topic were defined. Finally, the tool was piloted in eight hospitals for measurability, applicability, improvement potential, discriminatory capacity and feasibility. Results: The pilot test showed good measurability for all 19 patient safety topics (range of 8-291 MEs among topics), with good applicability (median 97 (range 11.8-100) per cent). The overall improvement potential appeared to be good (median 89 (range 72.5-100) per cent), and at topic level the tool showed good discriminatory capacity (variation 27.5 per cent, range in compliance 72.5-100 per cent). Overall scores showed relatively little variation between the participating hospitals (variation 13 per cent, range in compliance 83-96 per cent). All eight auditors considered SPOT a straightforward and easy-to-use tracer tool. Conclusion: A comprehensive tool to measure safety of care was developed and validated using a systematic, stepwise method, enabling hospitals to monitor, benchmark and improve perioperative safety performance

    Experience With Radical Resection in The Management of Proximal Bile Duct Cancer

    Get PDF
    Multiple surgical and nonsurgical approaches have been advocated for the treatment of proximal bile duct cancer. However, survival appears longest when a resection can be performed. Fifteen patients treated at a university center were managed with an aggressive surgical approach. Resection of the tumor was performed in 13 of 15 patients (87%). Of the patients undergoing resection, major hepatic resection was performed in 8 (62%), while excision of vessels with reconstruction was performed in 5 (38%). Eleven of the 13 resected patients (85%) were discharged from the hospital. Clinical symptoms of recurrent disease occurred between 3 and 36 months after surgery in 7 patients, 6 of whom have died. Three other patients are alive at 5, 21, and 36 months without clinical evidence of recurrence. There was no correlation between the completeness of resection and the duration of disease-free survival

    Respiratory Motion Correction in Dynamic PET with a Single Attenuation Map

    Get PDF
    In addition to static tracer uptake values used routinely in clinical facilities, PET imaging can provide useful information on tracer kinetics via the use of dynamic acquisitions where a set of time frames are acquired starting from the injection/inhalation of the radiotracer. In lung studies, kinetic parameters, estimated from compartmental modelling, are however affected by respiratory motion. When only one attenuation image is available, most existing motion compensation strategies are not appropriate for the initial short time frames, especially as the activity distribution changes rapidly over the early part of the dynamic acquisition. This work presents a preliminary study to handle respiratory motion using a two-step process that uses gated dynamic data as input. We first use joint reconstruction of activity and motion on the entire gated PET data to estimate deformation fields. This allows the subsequent reconstruction of each time frame separately with motion compensation. We present results comparing on one hand the compartment model fit residuals with and without respiratory motion compensation and on the other hand the diaphragm position in non-attenuation corrected images and from this method

    Liver transplantation for glycogen storage disease types I, III, and IV

    Get PDF
    Glycogen storage disease (GSD) types I, III, and IV can be associated with severe liver disease. The possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma and/or hepatic failure make these GSDs potential candidates for liver transplantation. Early diagnosis and initiation of effective dietary therapy have dramatically improved the outcome of GSD type I by reducing the incidence of liver adenoma and renal insufficiency. Nine type I and 3 type III patients have received liver transplants because of poor metabolic control, multiple liver adenomas, or progressive liver failure. Metabolic abnormalities were corrected in all GSD type I and type III patients, while catch-up growth was reported only in two patients. Whether liver transplantation results in reversal and/or prevention of renal disease remains unclear. Neutropenia persisted in both GSDIb patients post liver transplantation necessitating continuous granulocyte colony stimulating factor treatment. Thirteen GSD type IV patients were liver transplanted because of progressive liver cirrhosis and failure. All but one patient have not had neuromuscular or cardiac complications during follow-up periods for as long as 13 years. Four have died within a week and 5 years after transplantation. Caution should be taken in selecting GSD type IV candidates for liver transplantation because of the variable phenotype, which may include life-limiting extrahepatic manifestations. It remains to be evaluated, whether a genotype-phenotype correlation exists for GSD type IV, which may aid in the decision making. Conclusion Liver transplantation should be considered for patients with glycogen storage disease who have developed liver malignancy or hepatic failure, and for type IV patients with the classical and progressive hepatic form

    Reducing work pressure and IT problems and facilitating IT integration and audit &amp; feedback help adherence to perioperative safety guidelines: a survey among 95 perioperative professionals

    Get PDF
    Background: To improve perioperative patient safety, guidelines for the preoperative, peroperative, andpostoperative phase were introduced in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2013. To help the implementation ofthese guidelines, we aimed to get a better understanding of the barriers and drivers of perioperative guidelineadherence and to explore what can be learned for future implementation projects in complex organizations.Methods: We developed a questionnaire survey based on the theoretical framework of Van Sluisveld et al. forclassifying barriers and facilitators. The questionnaire contained 57 statements derived from (a) an instrument formeasuring determinants of innovations by the Dutch Organization for Applied Scientific Research, (b) interviewswith quality and safety policy officers and perioperative professionals, and (c) a publication of Cabana et al. Thetarget group consisted of 232 perioperative professionals in nine hospitals. In addition to rating the statements on afive-point Likert scale (which were classified into the seven categories of the framework: factors relating to theintervention, society, implementation, organization, professional, patients, and social factors), respondents wereinvited to rank their three most important barriers in a separate, extra open-ended question.Results: Ninety-five professionals (41%) completed the questionnaire. Fifteen statements (26%) were considered tobe barriers, relating to social factors (N = 5), the organization (N = 4), the professional (N = 4), the patient (N = 1),and the intervention (N = 1). An integrated information system was considered an important facilitator (70.4%) aswell as audit and feedback (41.8%). The Barriers Top-3 question resulted in 75 different barriers in nearly allcategories. The most frequently reported barriers were as follows: time pressure (16% of the total number ofbarriers), emergency patients (8%), inefficient IT structure (4%), and workload (3%).Conclusions: We identified a wide range of barriers that are believed to hinder the use of the perioperative safetyguidelines, while an integrated information system and local data collection and feedback will also be necessary toengage perioperative teams. These barriers need to be locally prioritized and addressed by tailored implementationstrategies. These results may also be of relevance for guideline implementation in general in complex organizations.Trial registration: Dutch Trial Registry: NTR3568.Keywords: Guideline adherence, Implementation, Implementation barriers, Implementation facilitators, Patientsafety, Perioperative car

    Increased adherence to perioperative safety guidelines associated with improved patient safety outcomes:a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised multicentre trial

    Get PDF
    Background: National Dutch guidelines have been introduced to improve suboptimal perioperative care. A multifaceted implementation programme (IMPlementatie Richtlijnen Operatieve VEiligheid [IMPROVE]) has been developed to support hospitals in applying these guidelines. This study evaluated the effectiveness of IMPROVE on guideline adherence and the association between guideline adherence and patient safety. Methods: Nine hospitals participated in this unblinded, superiority, stepped-wedge, cluster RCT in patients with major noncardiac surgery (mortality risk >= 1%). IMPROVE consisted of educational activities, audit and feedback, reminders, organisational, team-directed, and patient-mediated activities. The primary outcome of the study was guideline adherence measured by nine patient safety indicators on the process (stop moments from the composite STOP bundle, and timely administration of antibiotics) and on the structure of perioperative care. Secondary safety outcomes included in-hospital complications, postoperative wound infections, mortality, length of hospital stay, and unplanned care. Results: Data were analysed for 1934 patients. The IMPROVE programme improved one stop moment: 'discharge from recovery room' (+16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9-23%). This stop moment was related to decreased mortality (-3%; 95% CI, -4% to -1%), fewer complications (-8%; 95% CI, -13% to -3%), and fewer unscheduled transfers to the ICU (-6%; 95% CI, -9% to -3%). IMPROVE negatively affected one other stop moment - 'discharge from the hospital' - possibly because of the limited resources of hospitals to improve all stop moments together. Conclusions: Mixed implementation effects of IMPROVE were found. We found some positive associations between guideline adherence and patient safety (i.e. mortality, complications, and unscheduled transfers to the ICU) except for the timely administration of antibiotics

    Joint Activity and Attenuation Reconstruction From Multiple Energy Window Data With Photopeak Scatter Re-Estimation in Non-TOF 3-D PET

    Get PDF
    Estimation of attenuation from positron emission tomography (PET) data only is of interest for hybrid PET-MR and systems where CT is not available or recommended. However, when using data from a single energy window, emission-based non-time-of-flight (TOF) PET attenuation correction (AC) methods suffer from “cross-talk” artifacts. Based on earlier work, this article explores the hypothesis that cross-talk can be reduced by using more than one energy window. We propose an algorithm for the simultaneous estimation of both activity and attenuation images, as well as, the scatter component of the measured data from a PET acquisition, using multiple energy windows. The model for the measurements is 3-D and accounts for the finite energy resolution of PET detectors; it is restricted to single scatter. The proposed energy-based simultaneous maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation with photopeak scatter re-estimation algorithm is compared with simultaneous estimation from a single energy window simultaneous maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation with photopeak scatter re-estimation. The evaluation is based on simulations using the characteristics of the Siemens mMR scanner. Phantoms of different complexity were investigated. In particular, a 3-D XCAT torso phantom was used to assess the inpainting of attenuation values within the lung region. Results show that the cross-talk present in non-TOF maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation reconstructions is significantly reduced when using multiple energy windows and indicate that the proposed approach warrants further investigation
    corecore